Swiss voters to decide on ban on loud fireworks
Friday 23rd October 2026 on 19:15 in
Switzerland
Swiss voters will decide on November 29 whether to ban the sale and use of noisy fireworks nationwide, SRF reports. The initiative would pass only if it wins a majority of both voters and cantons.
The popular initiative aims to better protect people, animals and the environment from noise, air pollution, litter, accidents and fires. It calls for a ban on fireworks that generate noise.
What would change
If approved, a general nationwide ban on selling and using noisy fireworks would be written into the Federal Constitution. The initiative does not define which fireworks count as noisy. Its backers say quieter fireworks, such as Bengal lights and traditional fountain fireworks, should remain permitted.
Cantons could grant exemptions for larger events, such as August 1 celebrations. Individuals would still be barred from setting off noisy fireworks themselves. Parliament and the Federal Council would have two years to define the details, including what counts as noisy and which events qualify for exemptions.
Arguments for and against
Supporters say fireworks cause noise and litter and release fine particles and other pollutants. They argue that explosions cause stress and fear in animals, prompting flight responses that can be fatal. They also say restricting private fireworks would reduce accidents, serious injuries and fires.
Opponents warn that the initiative could severely restrict the fireworks industry, cause substantial revenue losses and threaten businesses’ survival. They argue that a constitutional ban would go too far, that fireworks are an important part of August 1 and New Year’s Eve celebrations, and that banning private use would excessively limit personal freedom. The arguments were cited in an SRG survey by GFS Bern.
Political recommendations
The Federal Council and Parliament oppose the initiative, saying it goes too far. The National Council rejected it by 131 votes to 50, with 18 abstentions. The Council of States voted against it by 40 to 3, with one abstention.